Table of Contents
I 'd add Toyota 2/3TC motor is someplace in the leading three but with those domestics you certainly have my top 4 of perpetuity for integrity. Brian composed: I miss my 4.9 truck. Never ever had an engine concern. Corrosion is a various tale. When the exhaust rusted off behind the feline it just seemed like a diesel.
I ask yourself just how hard a swap it would be to obtain it into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a tough time leaving it's very own method ... the 300i6 would do every little thing I need this vehicle to do patgizz created: 3 things in the vehicle globe refuse to break.
those should be held as the criteria to which whatever else is measured. sadly, practically whatever else pales in comparison. And the Toyota 2f/3f (based upon the chevy stovebolt 6 obviously) Wow, due to the outpour of praise, it looked excellent so I acquired it, below's the ad lmk what you guys assume Oops, really did not mean to be cryptic, it slipped my mind that the "5.0" was practically a 4.9 l.
first order of biz however, I'm fairly big, and the steering wheel to seat is rather narrow ... guy that wheel cover was not ribbed for my pleasure:-LRB- The only trouble I've ever seen with trucks like that, are busted shifters. Ford made them a little as well tough and they would snap right at the floorboard.
Keep in mind the gas mileage won't be the best in the world, yet it will certainly damn sure run for life. Never ever had an engine problem.
When the exhaust rusted off behind the pet cat it simply seemed like a diesel. In 4x4 it returned 15 combined, 20 freeway with the OD5. I ask yourself just how hard a swap it would be to obtain it right into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a hard time getting out of it's very own means ... The engine bay wasn't made for anything longer than a Mod motor. One CAN eliminate an engine from a '97 style F-150 from the top, yet it draws. Mod motors need to find out laterally and you have to pull the damper and water pump off of a 4.2. The core support does not unbolt like in F250s and later on F150s.
"They are normally reliable as gravity so long as they aren't sludged up" What engine enjoys sludge? Knurled wrote: wbjones wrote: Brian composed: I miss my 4.9 vehicle.
When the exhaust rusted off behind the cat it simply appeared like a diesel. I ask yourself how hard a swap it would certainly be to obtain it into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ...
Really really confined engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had actually currently figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek blog post, that I really did not make clear ... my poor In respond to spitfirebill: I added that point since when I had to discover a replacement 4.9 for my F150, I needed to go via each in every junkyard in South Jersey to find one that had not been sludged up really severely.
Bernie: Which is a better van, while we're going to speak about a few concerns of these vans, however I I'm plainly not going to come out and say one is far better than the other. Bernie: Well, they're basically the very same vehicle.
They appear to be a little extra used in that area, but, you recognize, those are several of the usages, yet they're basically the very same group of lorry. Mark: So, well, allow's begin with engines then. What concerns do you see in between these 2 cars? Bernie: Yeah. So allow's talk regarding engine and actually just to specify that the model years, we're going to begin with 2000 and up, you understand, I suggest, these vans have actually been around for a long period of time.
And, you recognize, for a variation of a Chevy van has actually been around considering that, you know, around that time too. Since 2000, I mean, Ford's, you can obtain these with V6 engines or V8s.
There's a great deal of concerns with these engines. In the earlier 2000 trigger plugs with strike to these engines, because they didn't have enough threading in the stimulate plug, which triggered troubles.
Really very confined engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had actually currently figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek message, that I really did not make clear ... my bad In reply to spitfirebill: I added that point due to the fact that when I needed to discover a replacement 4.9 for my F150, I needed to go through every one in every junkyard in South Jacket to discover one that wasn't sludged up truly terribly.
Bernie: Which is a better van, while we're mosting likely to speak regarding a few issues of these vans, yet I I'm clearly not going to come out and say one is better than the various other. So if that's what you're trying to find, you'll need to wait. Mark: So what are a few of the distinctions in between these 2 brands? Bernie: Well, they're basically the very same car.
They seem to be a little much more utilized in that area, but, you recognize, those are some of the uses, however they're essentially the very same classification of lorry. Mark: So, well, allow's begin with engines then. What issues do you see in between these two cars? Bernie: Yeah. Let's speak about engine and really simply to specify that the model years, we're going to begin from 2000 and up, you recognize, I imply, these vans have actually been around for a long time.
And, you know, for a version of a Chevy van has actually been around since, you understand, around that time too. Since 2000, I indicate, Ford's, you can get these with V6 engines or V8s.
There's a great deal of issues with these engines. In the earlier 2000 spark plugs with blow to these engines, due to the fact that they really did not have enough threading in the trigger plug, which created troubles.
Navigation
Latest Posts
Ford F150 dealership around Mesa
Ford F150 dealer near me Mesa, Texas
Ford F150 dealership around Mesa